Program Evaluation

Program Evaluation Standards

Indikus staff adhere to professional evaluation standards in five key areas: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy, accountability. These standards help ensure credible, robust, objective, efficient, and fair representations of programs.

UTILITY STANDARDS

Utility standards are intended to increase the extent to which program stakeholders find evaluation processes and products valuable in meeting their needs. They ensure that evaluations include:

  • Program Evaluator Credibility
  • Attention to Stakeholders
  • Negotiated Purposes
  • Explicit Values
  • Relevant Information
  • Meaningful Processes and Products
  • Timely, Appropriate Reporting
  • Concern for Consequences and Influence

FEASIBILITY STANDARDS

The feasibility standards help ensure that the program evaluation is effective and efficient. They improve the quality of the evaluation’s:

  • Practical Procedures
  • Contextual Viability
  • Use of Resources

PROPRIETARY STANDARDS

The proprietary standards support what is proper, fair, legal, right and just in a program evaluation. These standards address potential issues related to the evaluation’s:

  • Responsiveness and Inclusive Orientation
  • Formal Agreements
  • Human Rights and Respect
  • Clarity and Fairness
  • Transparency and Disclosure
  • Conflicts of Interests
  • Fiscal Responsibility

Program evaluation standards by Indikus.ACCURACY STANDARDS

Accuracy standards focus on the dependability and truthfulness of program evaluation representations, propositions, and findings, especially those that support interpretations and judgments about quality. They ensure that evaluations contain:

  • Justified Conclusions and Decisions
  • Valid Information
  • Reliable Information
  • Explicit Program and Context Descriptions Sound Information Management
  • Sound Designs and Analyses
  • Explicit Evaluation Reasoning
  • Proper Communication and Reporting

ACCOUNTABILITY STANDARDS

Accountability standards provide for comprehensive documentation of evaluations and focus on continuously improving program evaluation processes and products. They include:

  • Program Evaluation Documentation
  • Internal Metaevaluation
  • External Metaevaluation
  • Proper Communication and Reporting

Program Evaluation Process model adapted from Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., and Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Indikus’ program evaluators and planning professionals adhere to a set of principles:

Making sure we thoroughly understand what clients need.

Garnering valuable insights through detailed, holistic analyses.

Engaging stakeholders to be involved throughout the process.

Producing implementable and measurably effective goals.

Want to work with us?